[mythtv-users] Linux sucks -- so thinking of virtualizing MythTV
w.munson at comcast.net
Sun Jan 13 02:50:52 UTC 2008
Marc Barrett wrote:
> I am getting sick and tired of the inability to play h.264 1080p
> videos under Linux without pausing and stuttering, while the
> same system can play them under Windows flawlessly.
> Basically, you need a really fast system to play 1080p videos
> under Linux, while a much slower system, along with a moderate
> video card such as an nvidia 6200 and a PureVideo player,
> will do the job nicely under Windows. This is the exact opposite
> of the way things are supposed to be traditionally.
> So, what I am planning to do is get an HDHomeRun and
> virtualize the MythTV installation under Windows. That way I
> could have the recordings saved to a shared partition, and
> play them with Windows Media Player or some other player
> that supports PureVideo. This will obviously have problems
> in terms of speed, so I need ideas for options here.
> One idea I am exploring to speed things up a bit is to use
> a SQL database running natively under Windows to speed
> things up a bit, so the SQL doesn't have to run under the
> I am also exploring what virtualization to use. My system is
> an old 2.6Ghz Pentium 4 system, so it does not have the
> hardware virtualization stuff that the newer Intel and AMD
> processors have. I'd like to use the fastest
> virtualizor available, but I don't know which one. I've read
> good things about Parallels, but there is also colinux, which
> I've used in the past and which isn't bad despite the lack of
> attention that it gets.
> Of course, all this wouldn't be needed if Linux could play
> HD content on older systems as well as Windows, but
> somehow I don't see that happening.
All you need to do is wait a bit and the full native windows port of
myth will be a reality. Its about 60% ready now and should be in the
Good things come to those who wait :)
More information about the mythtv-users