[mythtv-users] What is the problem with ReiserFS that makes it unsuitable for MythTV?
Bruce Richardson
itsbruce at workshy.org
Tue Feb 5 10:59:15 UTC 2008
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 11:17:38PM -0800, Scott Alfter wrote:
> I'm on the fence as to whether to go with JFS or XFS (just compiled both as
> modules and added the relevant mkfs/fsck/etc. tools). I've tried JFS in the
> past...seem to recall it was usually OK, though it sometimes needed to be
> manually fsck'd to get it running right after a reset or power outage. I don't
> think I've ever used XFS for anything. Which of these would be the better way
> to go?
JFS puts a very heavy cpu load on a box if you ever have to iterate over
a large filesystem. XFS can be a little slow on the deletion side,
though this has mostly been fixed, and has a slighly higher risk of data
corruption after a crash. I personally prefer XFS, though.
--
Bruce
I see a mouse. Where? There, on the stair. And its clumsy wooden
footwear makes it easy to trap and kill. -- Harry Hill
More information about the mythtv-users
mailing list