[mythtv-users] To "Live TV" or not to "Live TV" within myth...

[Phil Bridges]

On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 9:24 PM, Steve Hodge <stevehodge at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Phil Bridges <gravityhammer at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Steve Hodge <stevehodge at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > But that's beside the point. It is not difficult to handle overruns with
>> > scheduled recordings (in fact I seem to remember some talk of a script
>> > to
>> > automatically handle sports overruns). You may prefer to use Live TV for
>> > sports, that's fine. But you're not going to convince people who don't
>> > use
>> > Live TV that your way is the best way, including the devs.
>> >
>>
>> If it's beside the point, why mention it?  I'm not trying to "convince
>> people who don't use Live TV that [my] way is the best way"; on the
>> contrary, I'm trying to keep people from knocking LiveTV (and the
>> people who are using it or trying to use it) nearly every time
>> somebody asks a question about it.
>
> A question is only going to be answered three ways:
> 1. "Yes, there's a solution, here it is."
> 2. "Have you considered not using Live TV since it doesn't do what you
> want?" Which is an answer you don't like.
> 3. "Fix it yourself." Which is also an answer that is often not received
> well.
>
> So what exactly do you want us to say if there is no solution?
>

How about nothing?