[mythtv-users] slow mythweb?

[Udo van den Heuvel]

Jens Baumeister wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 5:35 AM, Udo van den Heuvel <udovdh at xs4all.nl> wrote:
> 
>> None of the issues so far were trunk-related.
>> Scheduling is in all versions I presume.
> 
> Yes, but AFAIK there's a whole lot of stuff going on in trunk right
> now that could really affect performance. Not to mention taht trunk is
> known and warned to be unstable.
> 
>> So you are just 'getting tired' and there's no trunk-related problem around.
> 
> Running trunk as an end user is currently a problem all by itself.

It wasn't in the past.
I have been running trunk since Ramses Smeyers stopped making rpms.
Then I did an occasinal rpm for myself. Trunk.
Then there was a pause.
Then I took the latest trunk and it's almost up and running.
We fixed the scheduling thing which wasn't a trunk issue.
QT4 did not show me problems either.

It's only that for now the program appears to be runnign OK, except that
no mpg files are created. (!)

> Becuase there *are* issues in there. It's right in the middle of a
> major overhaul, things are slow, some stuff may be broken because of
> it. Choosing to use the current trunk instead of -fixes introduces a
> whole unecessary subset of problems into the equation.

Yes, yet stepping back to 21-fixes is not made easy because of this.
There's some database-difference.
I won't do that; I'm not gonna spend an unpredictable amount of time
getting everything as it is now.

> Besides, I really don't understand why you would intentionally prefer
> to run an unstable, buggy alpha version instead of the stable branch.

So please tell me the easiest way to 'downgrade' to 21-fixes.
Can I convert the database?
Keep most of my settings etc?

> And as for the DB downgrade: IIRC, you're really just starting out
> this project, aren't you?

Not entirely.
See above. The current database lists recordings back in 2006. There may
be 'proof' beyond that.

> So you wouldn't really lose much by wiping

Is that the only route?


Udo