[mythtv-users] Differences in Video Output
Michael Wisniewski
wiz561 at gmail.com
Sat Apr 19 13:19:09 UTC 2008
Thanks for the response. :)
Is DirectFB better than running myth through X11?
Thanks again!
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 9:42 PM, Dan Ritter <dsr-myth at tao.merseine.nu> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 08:51:50PM -0500, Michael Wisniewski wrote:
> > I was wondering if anybody has a guide to different video outputs in
> > mythtv, and the pro's and con's with all of them. When you compile
> > it, you get the following list...
> >
> > # Video Output Support
> > x11 support yes
> Basic display in X, rather than a framebuffer (DirectFB)
> > xrandr support yes
> X extension to change video resolution on the fly
> > xv support yes
> X extension to write video to screen; prereq for most
> others
> > XvMC support yes
> X extension for acceleration on most NVidia and some
> VIA/S3 uniChrome and some Intel adapters. Good for HD on most CPUs and
> necessary on some.
> > XvMC VLD support yes
> extra XvMC functionality on some VIA chips.
> > XvMC pro support no
> extra XvMC functionality on other VIA chips
> > XvMC OpenGL sup. no
> XvMC and OpenGl rendering on sufficiently spiffy cards
> > XvMC libs -lXvMCW
> where the card-specific interface library for XvMC is.
> > OpenGL video no
> OpenGL video alone for very high-end cards
> > OpenGL vsync no
> OpenGL synchronization method
> > DirectFB no
> Display without X
> > Fribidi formatting no
> Bidirectional text support for right-to-left languages.
>
> These are all off the top of my head, I may be wrong.
>
> -dsr-
>
> --
> http://tao.merseine.nu/~dsr/eula.html is hereby incorporated by reference.
> _______________________________________________
> mythtv-users mailing list
> mythtv-users at mythtv.org
> http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
>
More information about the mythtv-users
mailing list