[mythtv-users] Free US/Canada Listings
ben.kevan at gmail.com
Wed Sep 12 20:18:03 UTC 2007
On Wednesday 12 September 2007 09:15:16 am Brian Wood wrote:
> Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 08:58:47PM -0600, Brian Wood wrote:
> >> David Brodbeck wrote:
> >>> On Sep 11, 2007, at 3:12 PM, R. G. Newbury wrote:
> >>>> Up here, and in most of the
> >>>> common law world, the loser in the litigation pays the winner's
> >>>> legal costs.
> >>> I have really mixed feelings about "loser pays." I think it would
> >>> discourage individuals bringing suit against corporations, even if
> >>> there was a good chance of success, because if they lost they might
> >>> be bankrupted by having to pay the company's legal bills. Meanwhile
> >>> corporations wouldn't be similarly intimidated due to their deep
> >>> pockets.
> >> Another problem is that such a system discourages out-of-court
> >> settlements. I used to be involved in arbitrations that had "loser pays"
> >> clauses. When a case would settle both parties would refuse to pay,
> >> stating that they "didn't lose".
> > How about "richer person pays"?
> How about "stupider person pays"?
I am on board with:
"Anything that will bring down frivolous lawsuits pay"
Suing for getting burnt by your coffee?
Suing because McDonalds is getting you fat?
Yeah.. anything for the m greedy lawyers..
Make us afraid to do just about anything now a-days.
How much can you know about yourself, you've never been in a fight? I don't
wanna die without any scars. So come on; hit me
More information about the mythtv-users