[mythtv-users] Slow MySQL query after delete

David Brodbeck gull at gull.us
Thu Sep 6 21:56:17 UTC 2007

On Sep 6, 2007, at 2:36 PM, f-myth-users at media.mit.edu wrote:
> Oh, whoops.  Hadn't considered that.  (Does Myth have a "suggested" or
> (gulp) "supported" set of storage engines, or is it claimed that any
> storage engine MySQL supports will "work"?  I'm assuming 99% of
> everybody leaves theirs at the default, but of course we don't know.)

I'm actually curious if there are any performance benefits to using  
one over the other.  My understanding is InnoDB's main benefit over  
MyISAM is transaction support, which MythTV doesn't use, so I'm  
guessing no.  There may be other factors I'm not thinking of, though.

More information about the mythtv-users mailing list