[mythtv-users] OT: Nokia N800 only $236 at Amazon
R. G. Newbury
newbury at mandamus.org
Wed Oct 31 11:57:32 UTC 2007
Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 01:32:48PM +0000, R. G. Newbury wrote:
>>> Well, on this point... I also have to agree with Ken: that's much more
>>> important in these days of digital than it was with film. Ironically,
>>> F3s and F4s are *really* cheap these days. <$500 cheap. And they will
>>> be perfectly serviceable for roughly half of forever.
>> Hah! My Nikon F is still perfectly serviceable and I bought it used in
>> 1967. Still takes great photos and you can drive nails with it!
>
> Has anyone ever documented that story about the titanium F2's? :-)
And what story would that be? The titanium bodies which Nikon prodcued
for some of their cameras were awesome...And if I hadn't already owned a
perfectly good normal body, I would have grabbed the Ti versions. But
they were apparently basically handmade, since titanium cannot be forged
or weled: they were all machined from a solid block.
IIRC Nikon stopped producing Ti bodies because of environmental concerns
about steps in the production process...They were producing some toxic
by-product from a cleaning process (priopr to anodization iirc). The
acid wash produced titanium dioxide (the white in white paint), and that
was being dumped/escaped/poisoning the workers/offending the
greens...and Japan is more than a little wary of environmental toxins
(can you spell 'mercury poisoning'?).
>> Course no-one wants to buy it...And probably not my F3HP either...but
>> all my lenses work on both.
>
> I wouldn't mind an F4, but damn, digital's a lot cheaper.
>
>> Although my 35mm f3.5 PC lens may be a little difficult to use on a
>> digital body.
>
> Bastard. :-)
I'll make you even madder... My PC lens is some sort of protoype which
was never mass produced. If you check the usual sources, Nikon made a
28mm f3.5 PC and a 35mm f2.8 PC lens. Both use a manual stop down
aperture (to f32) and are awesome lenses. You focus wide open and then
close the aperture down to a pre-set stop for 'quick' shooting.
I own a 35mm f3.5.... which bears no serial number!...
Cost me about $250Cdn about the early 80's.. I wanted a wide angle lens
and this was available in the used section of a Toronto camera store.
The PC aspect is neat to play with. And a digital body is in the offing
I think...and my 300mm f4 EDIF will work fine on one of those..
Geoff
--
Tux says: "Be regular. Eat cron flakes."
More information about the mythtv-users
mailing list