[mythtv-users] New (for schedulesdirect.org) binaries for Mandriva...?

William Munson william_munson at bellsouth.net
Wed Aug 22 21:19:02 UTC 2007

David Brodbeck wrote:
> On Aug 22, 2007, at 1:27 PM, Michael T. Dean wrote:
>> On 08/22/2007 02:35 PM, jedi at mishnet.org wrote:
>>>> Daniel Kristjansson wrote:
>>>>> We will probably tag a 0.20.2 release tomorrow. Then it will take
>>>>> hours to days for the various distros to update their packages.
>>>>> Schedules Direct made sure to include packagers in the beta test
>>>>> group.
>>> Will the source tarball downloads be updated?
>> Why not use the appropriate SVN branch/tag to check it out?  (Note  
>> that
>> I'm not saying the tarballs won't be updated--I'm just wondering why
>> anyone uses them.)
> I'd guess two reasons:
> - Unfamiliarity with SVN.  I use it almost every day, but most people  
> who don't do software development don't, so it's something new they  
> have to learn.
> - A desire for a stable target.  The SVN trunk branch changes  
> constantly and sometimes breaks.  With a tarball you know you're  
> getting something that other people are using, which leads to more  
> confidence that it will actually work.  (Yeah, I know you don't have  
> to download trunk.  But I don't know if there's a stable branch that  
> includes SD yet, and selecting a branch adds yet another layer of  
> complexity for people who aren't familiar with SVN.)

The -fixes branch of SVN is the stable branch and YES it does include 
support. The tarball is simply a snapshot of -fixes on a given date. 
Personally I would rather have any fixes applied after that date too so 
if you can download a tarball and compile it, you can easily check out a 
svn branch and compile it.

Its a shame that the docs make it seem like -fixes should only be for 
the "gifted" when IMHO anyone who plays in linux should be able to 
compile from source.


More information about the mythtv-users mailing list