[mythtv-users] Supporting schedulesdirect.org
jakep_82 at hotmail.com
Wed Aug 8 18:57:11 UTC 2007
> Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 11:40:20 -0700> From: robert.current at gmail.com> To: mythtv-users at mythtv.org> Subject: Re: [mythtv-users] Supporting schedulesdirect.org> > On 8/8/07, Jake <jakep_82 at hotmail.com> wrote:> >> > Have you read Zap2it's letter to the community?> > Yes, I read it. Long ago. It doesn't explain anything really, other> than they made a decision that was within their rights to make.> > > They don't use the word> > fraud, but it's not exactly hard to figure out what they're talking about.> > yes, actually, it is hard to figure out. They couldn't do it anymore> because of "misuse" and "risk." But that all goes away for a fee?> But somehow, they don't want charge a fee?> > I'm sorry, once again there seems to be something that someone isn't> saying. I honestly, truely, don't know what your talking about. How> can it be a risk and misuse in the past, but not now? Can someone> define what the risk was? What the misuse was?> > I THOUGHT I figured it out, being the over zealous use of pulling> data.. The hardware load on their system... but, it didn't say that,> it was just my wild guess. If that was it, how will> schedulesdirect.org prevent it?> > if that wasn't it, then I don't know what it was.. so I'm asking.> > > Now that money is involved, I don't see fraud or violation of TOS being a> > major problem.> > I don't see how money solves the problem. Because, to me, it's> totally unclear what the problem was in the first place.> > Yes, loosing Zap2It is a problem, in the end. But the problem that> CAUSED them to stop is still a bit foggy to me.Having read some of your other posts, it's obvious you're way too into conspiracy theories. It's really not that complicated.
See what you’re getting into…before you go there
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the mythtv-users