[mythtv-users] Raid 5 Performance Tweaking
Dean Wilson
dean.k.wilson at gmail.com
Mon Jun 5 21:13:03 UTC 2006
Sorry -- the last email should read "defined in the LVM howto
(http://www.die.net/doc/linux/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO-4.html) as 'chunks of
data'"
On 6/5/06, Dean Wilson <dean.k.wilson at gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry if this is a stupid (perhaps related?) question: I have LVM
> installed on top of my raid array. Should my physical extents
> (defined in the as "chunks of data") be the same size as the raid
> chunks? (vgdisplay /dev/VolGroup00 returns a PE size of 32MB.)
>
> --- Volume group ---
> VG Name VolGroup00
> System ID
> Format lvm2
> Metadata Areas 1
> Metadata Sequence No 6
> VG Access read/write
> VG Status resizable
> MAX LV 0
> Cur LV 5
> Open LV 5
> Max PV 0
> Cur PV 1
> Act PV 1
> VG Size 931.53 GB
> PE Size 32.00 MB
> Total PE 29809
> Alloc PE / Size 26935 / 841.72 GB
> Free PE / Size 2874 / 89.81 GB
> VG UUID qeWJuY-j7MI-6R6n-UETw-5LyN-knCS-5Um8Ay
>
> Thanks!
>
> On 6/5/06, Dean Wilson <dean.k.wilson at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I recently installed Fedora Core 5 from scratch on a raid5 array of 5
> > disks. But I didn't see any options for how to configure the raid
> > array, and now I'm wondering if it could be tweaked better for large
> > files (i.e. for use with myth) I read in the wiki
> > (http://www.mythtv.org/wiki/index.php/RAID, and
> > http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Software-RAID-HOWTO-9.html) that a 32K chunk
> > size and 4K block size was the best setup. However, I notice that
> > when I run 'cat /proc/mdstat' I get the following:
> >
> > Personalities : [raid5] [raid4]
> > md0 : active raid5 sdd1[4] sdc1[3] sdb1[2] sda1[1] hda3[0]
> > 976783360 blocks level 5, 256k chunk, algorithm 2 [5/5] [UUUUU]
> >
> > Apparently the default setup for FC5 was 256k chunks. (Which doesn't
> > state block size -- anyone know how to find that?) I noticed that the
> > raid performance page doesn't test beyond 32K chunk sizes -- does
> > anyone know which is best? (I would think that larger chunk sizes are
> > better for large files, but I don't know...)
> >
> > Also, I found the Raid Howto
> > (http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Software-RAID-HOWTO-5.html) which states
> > that "RAID-{4,5} performance is severely influenced by" stride
> > settings for mke2fs. Since I'm using xfs, is there a similar setting
> > I should use?
> >
> > (I guess I should also ask if it's possible to change these settings
> > at this point? If not, would the performance gain be worth
> > reinstalling?)
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> > ~Dean
> >
>
More information about the mythtv-users
mailing list