[mythtv-users] XvMC, Plextor Question, and Sound
Nathan Lutchansky
lutchann-mythtvusers at litech.org
Fri Feb 10 23:11:39 UTC 2006
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 03:24:30PM -0700, Brian Wood wrote:
> On Feb 10, 2006, at 2:12 PM, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> > Brian Wood wrote:
> > In addition to XvMC support, recording to Mpeg-2
> > would allow
> > for DVD burning via MythBurn.
>
> Well the world is going the other way, towards mpeg4. I heard that
> DirectV's newest satellite is putting out mpeg4 streams, with
> Echostar to follow soon.
Actually, the world is going to H.264, which isn't supported in any
video card yet as far as I know. MPEG4 isn't used for much commercial
content at all aside from what the DivX folks are able to get their
hands on.
> Well you could always transcode mpeg4 to mpeg2 and then burn, would
> take a lot of CPU cycles though. In fact you'd have to transcode
> anyway, as the Plextor only supports 640x480, unless you recorded at
> 320x240.
The Plextor supports any resolution up to D1; does MythTV not offer the
option of 720x480 (720x576 for PAL)?
> > Maybe I'm being naive, but I don't think it will be all that difficult
> > to add support for mpeg-2.
The IVTV hardware outputs an MPEG2 program stream, which MythTV writes
to disk directly. The Plextor only outputs an elementary stream, so
you'd probably have to put a program stream mux into Myth to get it to
work. I'm not sure though; maybe MythBurn can remux for you.
> >> The Plextor has been working surprisingly well, but if anyone is
> >> considering one, be aware that it does not embed the sound in the
> >> MPEG stream, the way a PVR does. Rather it sends uncompressed sound
> >> to ALSA as PCM, which requires a sound card input.
> >
> > MythTV then compresses this audio to mp3 using your system's CPU (by
> > default - you can
> > turn it off in the recording profiles), so the plextor will actually
> > cause mythbackend to burn a
> > good bit more CPU than a true PVR card.
>
> That's my point, and I wonder why Plextor went the way they did.
> AFAIK there are no MPEG2 encoder chips that won't do audio, so
> there's no money to be saved there.
Probably 90% of these chips go into video surveillance systems, so
adding half again more to the unit cost for an on-board audio encoder
wouldn't have made any sense for that market. As for why Plextor chose
that chip, well, there weren't a whole lot of MPEG4 hardware encoders on
the market four years ago. -Nathan
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mythtv.org/pipermail/mythtv-users/attachments/20060210/0cca8d35/attachment.pgp
More information about the mythtv-users
mailing list