[mythtv-users] NFS woes
b.f.lundin at gmail.com
Wed Dec 6 21:29:58 UTC 2006
>>> thor, bragi,loki
I see a pattern in the naming scheme I would not expect outside a
nordic country, nice ;-)
> I found that samba ( cifs ) is faster than NFS for me so I use cifs to
> mount most of
> my drives. I have a dedicated NAS box that has 2TB of drives. They are
> xfs formatted
> partitions. My backend and frontend use mount.cifs to mount them.
> I don't have
> any issues transfering data across my gigabit network. All of my
> boxes run
> Fedora FC5.
Eventhough I got much more modest hardware, I also have
exported XFS with Samba (cifs) in order to get some performace at all.
4 machines are involved, 3 linux (Gentoo and Ubuntu) and a mac (ppc),
and they all mount the cifs
as read-only. The mac mounts one NFS fileshare as read-write, and the
performace difference on that contra cifs is great, to the cifs'
b dot f dot lundin at gmail dot com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the mythtv-users