[mythtv-users] QAM channels through my TV (but not my tuner)
R. G. Newbury
newbury at mandamus.org
Sun Dec 3 20:56:10 UTC 2006
Tom Lichti wrote:
> R. G. Newbury wrote:
>> Tom Lichti wrote:
>>
>>> Isn't that kind of what I said, only with more words? :)
>>>
>>> Tom
>> The short version elided the distinction between encoded and encrypted.
>>
>> I'm a lawyer. I am shocked, appalled and dismayed that you would ever
>> think, believe or ascribe to the notion that I have been long-winded,
>> verbose or prolix. To the contrary, I am always and forever terse, short
>> and succinct!
>
> Right, I should have remembered that. :)
>
> Although, I don't think your distinction is valid, since all of the
> channels that Rogers puts on the wire digitally are encoded in qam256,
> only *some* of them are *also* encrypted. :P
>
> Tom
Exactly. I can't find your original post but it implied (or I inferred
from it) that you believed that encrypted and encoded were distinctly
different delivery methodologies, whereas your last statement is the
truth of the matter.
Geoff
More information about the mythtv-users
mailing list