[mythtv-users] is mythtv smart enough to do this(overlap/back-to-back) with recordings?
ijr at case.edu
Tue Aug 1 22:25:50 UTC 2006
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 3:27 am, chris at cpr.homelinux.net wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 04:00:50PM +1200, Steve Hodge wrote:
> > That argument applies to any functionality. You may say that
> > functionality is not worth the extra code, I disagree. I'd argue that
> > the "fragments" proposal doesn't provide enough extra over the
> > "overlap" proposal to justify it's implementation, and I'm sure you
> > disagree there.
> Actually, I completely agree. The fragments method would have been
> the better design from the beginning because you can do so much
> more with it, but at this point it's too late because it would
> involve rewriting so much code it would be easier to just start
Actually, it'd be rather easy to do, mainly would just have to change the
deletion code, and add another db table. Just a variation of the existing
live-tv code, really, with smaller chunk sizes. I still don't like the
downsides to it, though.
More information about the mythtv-users