[OT] Re: [mythtv-users] MythNotify suggestions
Mike
stuff at dustsmoke.com
Wed Sep 7 01:26:01 UTC 2005
chris at cpr.homelinux.net wrote:
>
>While the geek factor is admirably high, this probably wasn't a good way
>to spend $100 if you really want to have CID available all the time.
>
>I bought a *talking* Caller-ID box for less than that. Not only does it
>annouce the incoming calls by number, it can also match certain numbers
>and either announce them verbally (ie: payphones say "PAYPHONE" instead
>of speaking the number) or actually pick up the phone and tell them to
>go away ("The person you have dialed is not accepting your call.
>Goodbye.") which is great for telemarketers - I have it programmed to
>PFO any callers that block their CID. Even though I didn't build it
>myself, the geek factor is still up there and the WAF is out of this
>world.
>
>And it works when the TV is off.
>
>
>
Yes, talking caller id does sound pretty cool.
But I think it might depend on your situation. I wouldn't hear something
like that in other rooms where I have myth frontends. But if I got bored
one day, I could write a little listener on windows to run the XML
broadcast through MS Agent. Or I could make a little listener on linux
to do the same thing through festival. Heck, I could even make it email
my phone or work every time somebody calls. And since I have 2 servers
running misc tasks around the house, I could have one of those speak all
the time. Geek factor is unlimited once you have something you can
already get at. That is why I would rather have something with unlimited
access for $100 rather than a device that only does what somebody else
told it to do. (my main reason for having mythtv in the first place)
-Mike
P.S. If I were to ever do something like that, I would surely pass it along.
More information about the mythtv-users
mailing list