[mythtv-users] Is xfs flaky or is it my drive. Fedora Core 2, XFS, Myth .16 and .17

[Jarod Wilson]

On Sunday 13 March 2005 17:57, Will Dormann wrote:
> tdixon at dixbizserv.com wrote:
> > - Are people using XFS and finding it generally stable or flaky like I
> > find it?
>
> I've been using XFS on my main storage for over 7 months now.   Not a
> single problem with it.    Running Gentoo.

I've got a 650GB XFS-formatted LVM volume in my master backend that's been 
running non-stop for over a year now and a 320GB XFS-formatted LVM volume in 
a slave backend that's been running for about seven months non-stop. Overall, 
I've been using XFS for over two years, never a problem, across Fedora Core 
1, 2 and 3. XFS is generally rock-solid, unless you're constantly filling up 
the partition.

-- 
Jarod Wilson
jarod at wilsonet.com

Got a question? Read this first...
     http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
MythTV, Fedora Core & ATrpms documentation:
     http://wilsonet.com/mythtv/
MythTV Searchable Mailing List Archive
     http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mythtv.org/pipermail/mythtv-users/attachments/20050313/cf83c3cd/attachment.pgp