[mythtv-users] Re: This is odd...

Jarod Wilson jcw at wilsonet.com
Mon Sep 20 16:56:01 EDT 2004

On Monday 20 September 2004 13:04, Isaac Richards wrote:
> On Monday 20 September 2004 03:49 pm, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > In retrospect, perhaps Myth rpm builds with new features ought to sit in
> > testing for a bit before moving to stable so we don't run into things
> > like this.
> You think that'd work?  What about the rather large number of people on
> this list who reported issues with the mythtv-suite package when it was
> broken in testing?

You definitely have a point there. However, the new default ATrpms setup gives 
people stable only, and allows the entire install to happen without enabling 
any lower stability class repo (okay, except for ivtv). But of course, that 
only applies to clean installs, not upgrades. To be even safer, new builds 
could go to bleeding (though I suppose people might still report 
problems...). I guess the bottom line is more testing by those who really 
know what they're doing before packages are released.

Jarod C. Wilson, RHCE
jcw at wilsonet.com

Got a question? Read this first...
MythTV, Fedora Core & ATrpms documentation:
MythTV Searchable Mailing List Archive
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mythtv.org/pipermail/mythtv-users/attachments/20040920/0414dd87/attachment.pgp

More information about the mythtv-users mailing list