[mythtv-users] 2 short questions.
Michael T. Dean
mtdean at thirdcontact.com
Fri Oct 22 02:46:05 UTC 2004
>On Wednesday 20 October 2004 11:41 am, sschaefer1 at woh.rr.com wrote:
>>I was just hoping to reduce the number of mythbackend
>>processes/childs/threads. I don't watch that much TV and I can't see why
>>there would need to be that many waiting threads/processes.
> The backend keeps a pool of instatiated threads around to serve requests as
>they come in. This avoids the cost of starting a new thread on every request,
>which is a good thing.
> 1) Threads in the same process share the same memory.
> 2) A non executing thread uses (essentially) no CPU resources.
> Given 1 and 2, I personally fail to understand why people seem so concerned
>with how many threads are in use.
I agree. Besides, what else are you going to do with your processor
cycles? Sure, the idle thread *seems* to need a lot of processor time,
but my system has been doing great since I installed BOINC/SETI (
http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ), even though it took all the
processor time away from the idle thread. ;)
More information about the mythtv-users