[mythtv-users] Frequencies ruined after tv_grab_na_dd 0.14 backport attempt (remail)

[William Powers]

+--------+---------+--------+----------+----------+------------+---------------------------------------------------+----------+--------------+-----------------------+-------------+----------+------------+--------+-------+----------+
| chanid | channum | freqid | sourceid | callsign | name       | icon                                              | finetune | videofilters | xmltvid               | recpriority | contrast | brightness | colour | hue   | tvformat |
+--------+---------+--------+----------+----------+------------+---------------------------------------------------+----------+--------------+-----------------------+-------------+----------+------------+--------+-------+----------+
|   1002 | 2       | 2      |        1 | KNWS     | 2 KNWS     |                                                   |        0 |              | C2knws.zap2it.com     |           0 |    32768 |      32768 |  32768 | 32768 |          |
|   1003 | 3       | 3      |        1 | KZJL     | 3 KZJL     |                                                   |        0 |              | C3kzjl.zap2it.com     |           0 |    32768 |      32768 |  32768 | 32768 |          |
|   1004 | 4       | 4      |        1 | KTXH     | 4 KTXH     |                                                   |        0 |              | C4ktxh.zap2it.com     |           0 |    32768 |      32768 |  32768 | 32768 |          |
|   1005 | 5       | 5      |        1 | KHWB     | 5 KHWB     |                                                   |        0 |              | C5khwb.zap2it.com     |           0 |    32768 |      32768 |  32768 | 32768 |          |



Peter Sebastian Masny wrote:

>Anyway, I have no idea why the channel table is not re-populating with
>appropriate freq values.  I guess what I need is to know what the freqid
>values should look like for "us-cable" and do it by hand.  Maybe a kind
>soul could send me a dump, or a link to something describing the
>appropriate values?
>  
>