Joseph A. Caputo
jcaputo1 at comcast.net
Thu Jan 8 23:01:55 EST 2004
On Thursday 08 January 2004 12:42, Curtis Wood wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 22:58, Steve Bower wrote:
> > >>>>> "Curtis" == Curtis Wood <curtis at penguinbrat.com> writes:
> > Curtis> On the good side - I just won an xbox on ebay - aparently you
> > Curtis> can get the HDTV resoloutions from the it (1280x720;720p) - it
> > Curtis> was just released.... Now I just need the pcHDTV card, heh...
> > There has been a discussion that the xbox's CPU doesn't have the
> > horsepower to decode HDTV streams, so it's not usable for displaying
> > what you would record with the pcHDTV card.
> > My Athlon 2500+ pegs its CPU playing 1080i with Xv support, splitting
> > about 80/20 between xine and the X server; with XvMC support, it's about
> > 80% used, just by xine (20% idle).
> > Steve.
> My plan is to try and get it to act much like dumb terminal - basically
> just a display device, X, Myth and everything else running on the
So, you plan to have your server/backend decode the HD stream for playback and
pipe raw video to your X-box, which will output it to the TV? I hope you
have a lot of bandwidth on your LAN...
...or do you plan to run mythfrontend on your server/backend box, and export
the X display to your X-box? That will work for the GUI, but I don't think
you'll be able to watch video that way.
MythTV wasn't designed to work that way. The frontend (i.e., the box hooked
up to your TV) has to do the decoding. In your case, if you want an X-box
frontend, then you're going to be trying to get an X-box to decode the HD
Your best option here would be to have the backend auto-transcode your
recordings down to a resoluton that can be handled by the X-box for playback.
Of course, there are 2 drawbacks to this: (1) you won't be able to watch
your recordings until after they've been transcoded, and (2) it seems kind of
pointless to record an HD stream and then transcode it down to NTSC/PAL
More information about the mythtv-users