[mythtv-users] I'm in....
Chris Delis
chris at delis.net
Fri Nov 14 10:33:37 EST 2003
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Boyd II, Willy wrote:
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Torsten Schenkel [mailto:torsten.schenkel at web.de]
> >Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 9:07 AM
> >To: Discussion about mythtv
> >Subject: Re: [mythtv-users] I'm in....
> >
> >
> >On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 15:50, bpierce815 at charter.net wrote:
> >> On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 06:27:01 -0800 (PST)
> >> Peter Greis <peter_greis at yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >Greetings All,
> >>
> >> Greetings
> >>
> >> >One observation is that it takes an eternity (4-5
> >> >seconds) to change channels. Is anyone else seeing
> >> >this ?
> >>
> >> I also see that it takes a long time to change channels, I
> >> was attributing mine to the slow cpu(C3 Nemiah). But I am
> >> not sure that this is correct.
> >
> >No, the channel change can't be instantaneous. What you are
> >watching is a stream that's been recorded to disk and is
> >played from there. You are usually 3-4 seconds behind, so
> >it'll take this time to change channels. There might be a
> >possibility with playing the first minute a bit slower to
> >accumulate the 4 second buffer, but I don't think I'd like that.
> >
> >Hint: Use the browse mode!
>
> One thing I'm still trying to figure out is how this 3,4-second buffer is
> determined. Is it variable, and depending mainly on speed of hardware? I
> know a buffer must exist, not disputing that. Just wondering about how the
> size of the buffer is determined. Is it simply a matter of the player will
You can determine the size of the ringbuffer during setup.
Also, I _think_ part of the delay is caused by deleting the old ringbuffer
and creating a new one.
> play as soon as it sees data, and 3-4 seconds is the best we can do? Or is
> it stored in some variable in the code, and 3-4 seconds worth of data seemed
> reasonable for most systems? (And I'm actually one that promised to look
> through the code and figure this out :-D I have to admit I haven't gotten
> beyond a few basics timing tests in my spare time, so not trying to be a
> hypocrite) Does anyone with a Tivo or ReplayTV see a 3-4 second delay? For
> a hardware encoder, and therefore just a simple player off of /dev/video0,
> with modern hardware, I'm surprised that 3-4 seconds is the smaller buffer
> that will play reliably. For software encoding I realize that's a different
> story... but if the buffer is designed around a catch-all solution, maybe
> it can be shortened for hardware encoder systems?
>
> - Willy
>
> >
> >> I am also seeing video and
> >> audio get a little jumpy when the OSD comes up. Are you
> >> seeing this as well? What hardware are you running?
> >
> >This is due to the slow hardware. ME6000 on this side. Got
> >lots better with the pvr350 though.
> >
> >Torsten
> >--
> >Config files for pvr350 tv-out and framebuffer:
> >http://www-isl.mach.uni-karlsruhe.de/>~hi93/ivtv-pvr-350-conf.tgz
> >
> >
>
>
More information about the mythtv-users
mailing list