[mythtv-users] Re: Developers: Future of MythTV?

Eric Thelin eric at generation-i.com
Mon Dec 8 20:24:57 EST 2003


There is also the issue of time and processing required to transcode the
files to a format other than the one that it was recorded in originally.
I like the two types of discs but I would think of them as primarily
based on the input source used to record them.  So if the file is a
*DVD* encoded MPEG2 then by all means use standard DVD format but if the
files are anything else provied an option to transcode it to a DVD
compatible format or record as files that you would play back through
myth only.  Because most of the time waiting the MANY hours that would
be required to transcode from MPEG4 to MPEG2 isn't going to be what I am
looking for.  The other options are SVCD and friends and I think they
make good options once again IF the file is already in a compatible
format but I have to wait about 8 hours for nuvexport on my Athlon 2400+
for a one hour show to go from MPEG4 to SVCD.  At that rate it will take
a long to archive very much stuff.

Add my vote too as someone who would love to see this done.

Eric

On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, J. Donavan Stanley wrote:

>  James L. Paul wrote:
>
> >IMO, I see little reason to do two types of disks. When I archive I always try
> >to use an industry standard format to future-proof my discs as much as
> >possible. I don't want to go through any hoops in 10 years to read my discs.
> >:)
> >
> >
> It's a simple matter of storage space.  If you build a DVD player
> compilant disk you'll be able to archive out about 2 hours of video per
> DVD.  If you instead write MPEG4 files to the disk you can fit more
> hours on per disk.
>
>
> >I suppose it's not realistic yet to archive MPEG4 in a standard readable
> >format on plastic, but it certainly is for MPEG2. So for MPEG2 disks I'd
> >recommend a standard DVD format. There's no reason you can't include MythTV
> >metadata or whatever on a standard DVD. So you could play such disks on any
> >standard DVD player, and if you popped them into a MythTV box it would read
> >the metadata and have whatever extra functionality you want to include.
> >
> >
>
> I'm not inventing a new format here.  The only thing special about a
> MythDVD would be that the existance of the meta data in a specific file
> (think autorun.inf) that MythTV can then use to present the user with a
> DVD-like menu.  While it's true that this information COULD be stored on
> a regular DVD, the whole point of the MythDVD is that you can pack more
> video on a single disk if you give up comaptibility with DVD players
> (i.e. MPEG4 instead of MPEG2).
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mythtv-users mailing list
> mythtv-users at mythtv.org
> http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
>


More information about the mythtv-users mailing list