[mythtv] MythTV life-cycle support intentions
John Pilkington
J.Pilk at tesco.net
Tue Jul 24 20:40:10 UTC 2012
On 24/07/12 20:52, Monkey Pet wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Brian J. Murrell
> <brian at interlinx.bc.ca <mailto:brian at interlinx.bc.ca>> wrote:
>
> On 12-07-24 01:17 PM, Steven Adeff wrote:
> >
> > a lot of that is because most users are not willing to test
> during the
> > beta and release candidate period on a live system,
>
> And I'd guess that's because downgrading an upgraded (i.e. to beta and
> release candidate releases) Myth installation is so traumatic. If one
> wants to endure trying to drop databases and restore them (which mysql
> greenhorns are not going to be comfortable with) then a downgrade
> immediately after an upgrade is at least doable, but you've recorded a
> dozen programs already only to find that showstopper bug that you need
> to downgrade because the wife is screaming mad at you.
>
> Now what? Restore the pre-upgrade database and lose those 12
> recordings? Do you think that's going to make her any happier?
>
> If Myth provided +/-1 database compatibility so that one could upgrade
> and downgrade as simply as installing/removing packages, I bet more
> people would be willing to dip a toe in while the pool is still being
> filled up instead of waiting until it's full.
>
>
> Yes, not being able to downgrade easily is a major bummer. I bet if it
> was easier, please would be able to try it, then if it doesn't work,
> file a bugreport and downgrade until the bug is fixed, then try again.
>
>
> b.
>
If the only problem there is recovering recordings the 'native archive'
mode of MythArchive might be a starting point. It needs some TLC but
I've used it for 0.25 > 0.24. DVDs don't have to be involved.
More information about the mythtv-dev
mailing list