[mythtv] Schema updates

[f-myth-users at media.mit.edu]

    > Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 08:42:48 -0500
    > From: "Michael T. Dean" <mtdean at thirdcontact.com>

    > Refusing to make a patch unless someone has already promised to commit 
    > that change (sight unseen) is completely and totally the wrong approach 

Are you -deliberately- misunderstanding me, or do you just enjoy
putting words in my mouth?

I -never said- I was expecting someone to promise to commit a patch,
sight seen or sight unseen.  I -asked-, "If such a patch -did- exist,
would be be -impossible- to commit it because it was believed that the
whole problem the patch was trying to solve should not be solved?"

If you don't understand the difference between these two statements,
I suggest you go back to Logic 101 and relearn the difference between
inverse, converse, and contrapositive.

Furthermore, I never said "refuse".  I asked, "Is it worth my time to
go set up all the test infrastructure to do this, or anyone else's
time to try writing a patch?"  Isaac's answer last night seemed to say
"No."  His answer today seems to say, "Maybe, but only if you satisfy
apparently-contradictory requirements"---I'll work that out in a
separate message to him.

[ . . . sanctimonious and condescending lecture snipped . . . ]