[mythtv] Re: Ticket #430: Tuner busy on consecutive recordings
Mark Kundinger
mkundinger at yahoo.com
Sat Oct 8 19:18:50 UTC 2005
I was also experiencing the tuner busy problem yesterday. And making
the eventsleep change suggested did nothing.
For what it's worth, testing 7416 (which includes the change Daniel
made in 7410), I was able to tape 5 back-to-back shows on one tuner
(MPEG) and 3 back-to-back on the other (MJPEG).
This apparently diverges from JR's experience with 7410, and I cannot
offer any explanation for that.
--- Daniel Kristjansson <danielk at cuymedia.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-10-08 at 09:23 +0000, MythTV wrote:
> > #430: Tuner busy on consecutive recordings
> > Using r7410 it still misses every consecutive recording I throw at
> > it. I recently enabled 90 global seconds of under and over
> recording
> > just to see if it made a difference, but it didn't. It seems to not
> > do consecutive recordings whether there is any global under and
> over
> > recording time or not.
>
> I think the WaitForEventThreadSleep() changes are a Red Herring.
> Perhaps the inoverrecord state simply hasn't been entered when
> StartRecording is called, but will be entered a few seconds in
> the future.
>
> Could you try adding this before "if (inoverrecord)"
>
> VERBOSE(VB_IMPORTANT, "inover("<<inoverrecord<<
> ") time-till end("<<
> QDateTime::currentDateTime().secsTo(curRecording->recendts));
>
> It might tell us something....
>
> I'm thinking perhaps this is a race with the event loop for
> setting the inoverrecord variable. When it ran every 1/1000th
> of a second it usually won, but now that we run it once a
> second it often looses.
>
> -- Daniel
>
>
> > _______________________________________________
> mythtv-dev mailing list
> mythtv-dev at mythtv.org
> http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev
>
More information about the mythtv-dev
mailing list