[mythtv] Re: Re: Ticket #255: Improved scheduling of consecutive
programs with pre-roll/overrecord
Rudy Zijlstra
mythtv at edsons.demon.nl
Sat Oct 1 22:51:28 UTC 2005
Keith Irwin wrote:
>
> On Oct 1, 2005, at 4:32 AM, Rudy Zijlstra wrote:
>
>> The reason i do not like the unexpected behaviour of soft time
>> support, is that it significantly lowers F(amily)AF. There simply is
>> no way to explain the resulting behaviour to them... And considering
>> the serious extra time that is needed to solve the slippage here,
>> soft timing simply is not resulting in predictable behaviour. Yes i
>> understand your budget problem. I've gone to the length of using 3
>> back-ends, each with 2 tuners to fully solve the schedule conflicts
>> (4 analog tuners, 2 SAT tuners).
>
>
> I don't see how having the -option- of using soft time would lower the
> your family's acceptance of mythtv. -No one- is talking about forcing
> you to use soft time. "I don't want to use it" is not an argument
> against a feature which would be useful to others.
>
> Keith
>
>
>
I was answering the posed question of *why* i do not like it....
What others do is up to them. As long as it is an option, and does not
make things unstable.
Rudy
More information about the mythtv-dev
mailing list