[mythtv] development practices (regarding current live tv situation)

[Wylie Swanson]

Oh well, c'est la vie.

W

On 11/9/05, andrew burke <aburke at bitflood.org> wrote:
>
> > And I would argue that it is easier for you to "svn update -r 7738" (and
> > using a LiveTV working build) than it is for everyone else to fork
> another
> > branch. If you don't like a rapidly developing source tree, use stable.
>
> People wouldn't have to fork, only Isaac would have had to work in his own
> branch for doing that stuff. Once it was done, he could merge it back
> into the main trunk and everyone else could continue to work without
> jumping through hoops.
>
> > Issac, when you say not very long? Any thoughts as to how long? A couple
> > of days? week? more? ;)
>
> I've read ahead to Isaac's response of a week. A breakage for a day might
> not have necessitated a branch, but a week of brokenness seems like it
> might have been a good thing to compartmentalize.
>
> Pulling a branch is pretty easy:
>
> svn copy svn+ssh://.../trunk svn+ssh://.../livetvbroken
>
> and then the merge would have been:
>
> svn merge svn+ssh://.../livetvbroken svn+ssh://.../trunk
>
> Doesn't seem all that difficult to me.
>
> andy
>
> _______________________________________________
> mythtv-dev mailing list
> mythtv-dev at mythtv.org
> http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mythtv.org/pipermail/mythtv-dev/attachments/20051109/8dfdab37/attachment.htm