[mythtv] "stable" tag proposal
Scott Roland
scatterlined at mac.com
Tue Mar 22 22:19:40 UTC 2005
Kevin Kuphal wrote:
> Eggert Thorlacius wrote:
>
>> I feel like my question suffered a hostile takeover from another
>> thread :-) So in an attempt to get back to the original topic: does
>> anyone think that a weekly "stable" tag would be a good idea?
>
>
> Not necessarily. Abritrarily marking a particular point in time as
> "stable" is probably not effective. I think the other proposals in the
> thread about branching out the release line and applying critical
> patches to it would give a stable branch without the risk of the stable
> tag applying to something not really stable. As it stands, mythtv CVS
> is very stable a great percentange of the time. I run CVS all the time
> in my house and have really no issues with it related to comitted
> patches. Then again, I watch the commit list, keep up on the dev
> discussion, and know when something got checked in that is likely to
> break things.
I agree with Kevin. Tagging in CVS is not revisionable, so if this
week's stable tag is bad it is non-trivial to roll back to a previous
tag. I think a branch approach would be much more useful, especially for
those of us not as diligent as Kevin.
--
Scott Roland
More information about the mythtv-dev
mailing list