[mythtv] MythSOAP Expressions Of Interest
Adam Jenkins
ajenkins at infocomp.com
Mon Feb 21 20:58:18 UTC 2005
>>I _don't want_ to have to support bugs in multiple protocols.
That's ok, I don't write bugs :)
(light hearted :) )
-----Original Message-----
From: mythtv-dev-bounces at mythtv.org
[mailto:mythtv-dev-bounces at mythtv.org]On Behalf Of Isaac Richards
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 6:47 AM
To: Development of mythtv
Subject: Re: [mythtv] MythSOAP Expressions Of Interest
On Monday 21 February 2005 01:19 pm, Adam Jenkins wrote:
> >>Whether it's a SOAP, DBus, or MythTV Protocol
>
> I'm still at a loss why it has to be one or the other to tell you the
> truth. If you have a good OO system with, say, a bunch of command
> objects using a marshaller/unmarshaller system. Write the
> marshaller/unmarshaller with a standard interface and make it an
> abstract boundary (AbstractFactory). Let the user decide which protocol
> they want to run. In this case, the only thing that needs to change to
> support different protocols is the marshaller/unmarshaller. Then, when
> <insert fantastic new protocol here> comes along, you can just write a
> new marshaller/unmarshaller and plug it in when required.
I _don't want_ to have to support bugs in multiple protocols. Additionally,
this has to be integrated completely into myth - no more library
dependencies
are allowed for core functionality.
Isaac
_______________________________________________
mythtv-dev mailing list
mythtv-dev at mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mythtv.org/pipermail/mythtv-dev/attachments/20050222/9e891cdf/attachment.htm
More information about the mythtv-dev
mailing list