[mythtv] [offtopic] FileSystem to use for Myth
Boyd II, Willy
wboyd at fulbright.com
Mon Sep 15 17:14:55 EDT 2003
I too had serious corruption with reiserfs, but this was back before it was
even in the kernel or the userland tools were complete/working... so even I
take that with a grain of salt. Then again... all it takes it one instance
to piss off a guy enough to form a hard opinion :-D I've had nothing but
good experience with ext3 so far. And FWIW, the partition I'm using is on a
disk shared with WinXP, and the one partition holds all of RedHat9, so I'm
sure that's very much related to any slowdown I'm getting.
- Willy
-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Bucksch [mailto:linux.news at bucksch.org]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 4:08 PM
To: Development of mythtv
Subject: Re: [mythtv] [offtopic] FileSystem to use for Myth
Ben Bucksch wrote:
> I also had file corruption on XFS, but (from what I saw) only when the
> filesystem was not shut down properly (hard crash, power off without
> shutdown etc.).
These were only (some of) the files written in the (30?) seconds before
the crash, so I guess XFS just doesn't play very well with write caches
and crashes.
> FYI, I also heard reports (from friends' direct experience, mailing
> lists) about much more severe file corruption, without good reason
> like kernel crashs, so I don't know which file system to use.
Sorry, I meant "about much more severe file corruption *with reiserfs*
(almost whole file system trashed)".
More information about the mythtv-dev
mailing list